AppSync Alternative · GraphQL Federation
The AppSync Alternative Built for GraphQL Federation
AppSync works. But Federation has moved beyond what it was designed for. Cosmo gives you everything AppSync does on an open platform you own and can run anywhere, self-hosted or managed.
Run Cosmo alongside AppSync and migrate one subgraph at a time. No cutover day.
Why teams are moving
GraphQL Federation has outgrown what AppSync was built to do.
AppSync is a capable managed GraphQL service. But it was designed for a world of individual APIs, not federated graphs at scale. As teams grow (more subgraphs, more contributors, more clients), they hit the edges of what AppSync supports: AWS-only data sources, limited subscription flexibility, and a router you can't extend or own.
Cosmo is built specifically for Federation. Your resolvers stay where they are. Your subgraphs migrate as-is. You don't rebuild. You move to a platform built for where you're headed.
Same capabilities. Better foundation. No lock-in.
01
Ease of migration, no risk to the business
You don't have to rewrite your graph to move off AppSync. Cosmo supports the same resolver patterns, schema structure, and query execution model your teams already rely on. Migration is incremental: subgraph by subgraph, environment by environment. Move one subgraph at a time, keep AppSync serving the rest, and roll back instantly if anything looks off. Nothing flips for your users until you're ready.
02
No infrastructure management beyond the subgraph level
AppSync abstracted away the router. So does Cosmo, but without the AWS-only constraint. Cosmo manages the Router, the Schema Registry, observability, and composition. Your teams own the subgraphs. Everything above the subgraph layer is handled, monitored, and updated for you. No Kubernetes expertise required. No config sprawl.
03
Subscriptions that actually scale
AppSync subscriptions were tightly coupled to DynamoDB and difficult to extend beyond AWS-native data sources. Cosmo's subscription support is protocol-agnostic: WebSockets, SSE, and event-driven fan-out backed by NATS, Kafka, or Redis: any data source you already run.
Capability comparison
Everything AppSync offered. And the parts it didn't.
Switching from AppSync isn't about trading down. It's about moving to a platform designed for Federation at scale. Here's how the two compare on the capabilities that matter.
Cosmo vs AWS AppSync feature comparison, side by side
@authenticated and @requiresScopes directives in the schema.What to expect
A migration timeline built around your release cycle
Every migration is different. The size of your graph, the number of subgraphs, and the complexity of your resolver logic all factor in. Here's the path we recommend.
Days 1–3
Days 4–7
Days 8–14
The phases above add up to roughly two weeks for a production-grade graph. Smaller or greenfield graphs move faster.
In their words
What teams say about WunderGraph
“With Cosmo, we saved an estimated $178,000 just on building those features. That doesn't even include the cost of maintaining or supporting them long term.”
Karol Krogulec
Senior Engineering Manager, Acoustic
$178K
Saved
“Our infrastructure costs went from $14,000 with our previous provider down to $9,750 with Cosmo, even with some extra infra costs.”
Tim Caplis
Principal Software Engineer, SoundCloud
30%
Lower Costs
“We have experienced significant performance enhancements for our most complex queries since switching from Apollo to Cosmo. The query planning in Cosmo is more advanced and intelligently optimized.”
Fredrik Wärnsberg
Vice President of Engineering, Soundtrack Your Brand
5x
Faster Queries
“Now, Cosmo presents all the relevant stats—how many queries run, their response times, and key performance metrics—making it much easier to communicate what's happening under the hood. This improved observability not only enhances request tracing but also helps teams understand how their queries run in a federated system. Ultimately, Cosmo has made it much easier for teams to buy into Federation.”
Stephen Wootten
Senior Software Engineer, On The Beach
10x
Better Observability
“Cosmo's Advanced Request Tracing is instrumental to further optimize our subgraphs and enhance query performance for our customers. We're impressed with their swift response times and ease of communication.”
Jack
Head of platform, Tailor
2x
Faster Delivery
“A solution that is scalable and PCI compliant. Migrating to cosmo is super intuitive and took just a day to reconfigure everything.”
Tyler Hawkins
Backend Architect, Travelpass Group
1 Day
Migration
“We learned about WunderGraph Cosmo and deployed it into production in about ten days. I highly recommend WunderGraph Cosmo; they helped us pivot quickly when we needed a solution ASAP! Everything now is working perfectly.”
José Rose
Senior Developer, PemPem
10 Days
To Production
“We are switching to NATS since there is a huge need for asynchronous patterns and event sourcing. GraphQL subscriptions was a must for this. Implementation of EDFS was easy. When we are talking on our discord, they are there and they know what they are talking about. It really is a pleasure to work with WunderGraph.”
Vincent Vermersch
CTO, Monkey Factory
3x
Dev Velocity
Deploy Cosmo now. Run it alongside AppSync.
You don't have to cut over on day one. Deploy Cosmo today, run it alongside your existing AppSync setup, and migrate subgraph by subgraph at your pace, with our migration team available at every step.
Apache 2.0 open source · Self-host or fully managed · No usage-based pricing surprises
Common questions about AppSync migration
No. If your resolvers are already written as subgraph services, they migrate as-is. For AppSync-specific resolver logic tied to DynamoDB or Velocity templates, we provide mapping patterns and, where needed, direct migration support.
Yes. Cosmo's subscription layer is protocol-agnostic and works with any backend that can emit events Kafka, Redis Pub/Sub, WebSockets, NATS, and more. You're not limited to DynamoDB streams.
That's what GraphQL Federation was built for. Cosmo's router composes subgraphs from multiple data sources into a single unified graph the same pattern AppSync's data sources enabled, but portable, extensible, and not tied to AWS infrastructure.
Both. You can self-host Cosmo on any cloud or on-premises infrastructure, or use WunderGraph's fully managed cloud offering. The same codebase, the same features, your choice of where it runs.
Ready to move beyond AppSync?
Whether you're hitting AppSync's limits today or planning ahead, WunderGraph specialises in AppSync migrations we've done this before, we've documented every edge case, and we'll get your team to production on Cosmo without disrupting your roadmap.


